· 8/9/2013

United States v. Jo Anna Bame

Citations

721 F.3d 1025
2013 WL 4033962
112 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5656
2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

noting that “it is the existence of an adequate legal remedy that precludes unjust enrichment recovery”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Bright, Bye

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.