Skip to main content
· 2/15/1985

United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson

Citations

  • 754 F.2d 1182
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 28309

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • indictment for perjury not multiplic-itous when it contains charges for \separate and distinct false declarations . . . [even if] they are all related and arise out of the same transaction or subject matter\
  • indictment for perjury not multiplicitous when it contains charges for “ ‘[s]eparate and distinct false declarations [even if] they are all related and arise out of the same transaction or subject matter’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Reavley, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.