Skip to main content
· 3/27/2012

United States v. Jin Hua Dong

Citations

  • 675 F.3d 698
  • 2012 WL 1003517
  • 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6195

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “However, he fails to acknowledge that fraud causing a loss to Countrywide was expressly stated in the description of the scheme contained in paragraphs 1 through 67 of Count One, which was incorpo- rated by reference in Counts Seven and Eight.”
  • “However, he fails to acknowledge that fraud causing a loss to Countrywide was expressly stated in the description of the scheme contained in paragraphs 1 through 67 of Count One, which was incorpo- rated by reference in Counts Seven and Eight.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Tinder, Shadid

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.