United States v. Jin Han Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a general unanimity instruction is normally sufficient
• “[I]t was not necessary for the jurors in this case to unanimously agree on a specific classification of Kim’s conduct.”
• “[I]t was not necessary for the jurors in this case to unanimously agree on a specific classification of Kim’s conduct.”
• “[I]t was not necessary for the jurors in this case to unanimously agree on a specific classification of Kim’s conduct.”
• “[I]t was not necessary for the jurors in this case to unanimously agree on a specific classification of Kim’s conduct.”
• “In the ordinary case, a general unanimity instruction suffices to instruct the jury that they must be unanimous on whatever specifications form the basis of the guilty verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).