United States v. Jimmy Lee Williams, United States of America v. Jimmy Lee Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that error in admission of evidence is harm- less if improper evidence did not substantially influence jury
• holding that error in admission of evidence is harmless if the improper evidence did not substantially influence the jury
• stating that the Court reviews for plain error when the “motion in limine was not based upon [and did not seek] a ruling on the precise issue [the defendant] now seeks to raise” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)
• stating that the Court reviews for plain error when the “motion in limine was not based upon [and did not seek] a ruling on the precise issue [the defendant] now seeks to raise” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)
• stating that the Court reviews for plain error when the “motion in limine was not based upon [and did not seek] a ruling on the precise issue [the defendant] now seeks to raise” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)
• stating that the Court reviews for plain error when the “motion in limine was not based upon [and did not seek] a ruling on the precise issue [the defendant] now seeks to raise” (emphasis added) (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).