United States v. Jimmie Moon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that Application Note 3(F)(i)'s express use of the terms \counterfeit\ and \unauthorized\ access devices indicated that any usability requirement must be permissive enough to encompass such devices in its scope
• “We . . . reject [defendant’s] argument for a ‘usability’ requirement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).