· 3/31/1987
United States v. Jim C. Bergman
Citations
- 813 F.2d 1027
- 22 Fed. R. Serv. 1316
- 59 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 896
- 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no error in the district court's refusal to acknowledge defendant's pro se filings because he was represented by counsel
- trial court was not required to 4 acknowledge pro se filings by a criminal defendant who was represented by counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hug, Schroeder, Norris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.