Skip to main content
· 3/31/1987

United States v. Jim C. Bergman

Citations

  • 813 F.2d 1027
  • 22 Fed. R. Serv. 1316
  • 59 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 896
  • 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 4023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no error in the district court's refusal to acknowledge defendant's pro se filings because he was represented by counsel
  • trial court was not required to 4 acknowledge pro se filings by a criminal defendant who was represented by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Schroeder, Norris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.