United States v. Jevon Jenkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court plainly erred when it adopted “erroneous information in a PSR” no matter how “correct such information appears”
• holding that the district court plainly erred when it adopted “erroneous information in a PSR” no matter how “correct such information appears”
• holding that assigning a defendant three criminal history points under 720 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/24-1.6 was plain error, vacating the sentence, and remanding for resentencing
• holding that the defendant did not waive his right to appeal the inclusion of a conviction in his criminal history calculation even though he failed to object to that portion of the PSR
• holding that the defendant did not waive his right to appeal the inclusion of a conviction in his criminal history calculation even though he failed to object to that portion of the PSR
• holding that waiver did not occur because we could “conceive of no reason why [the defendant] would have intentionally relinquished an objection certain to result in a' lower criminal history score and sentencing range, nor ha[d] the government offered one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).