United States v. Jesus Zambrana, Sr., Charles Cole and Jay Zambrana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding necessity based on evidence that informants and undercover agents could not infiltrate the closely run family organization
• stating defendant may not complain about use of government's transcript \[b]ecause defendants had ample opportunity to either challenge specific portions of the government's transcript or to prepare an alternate version\
• stating \it is more properly the function of the finder-of-fact to weigh the evidence presented by the parties as to the accuracy of the proffered translation and to determine the reliability of the translation on the basis of that evidence\
• Cases involving allegations that designations of speakers on transcripts utilized during identification of voices on tapes resulted in improperly suggestive identification procedures
• “Our Circuit recognizes that ‘the government’s burden of establishing its compliance with [subsection 2518(1)(c)] is not great,’ and that the requirement that the government exhaust ‘normal investigative procedures’ be reviewed in a ‘practical and commonsense fashion.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).