United States v. Jesus Villalobos

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the iden- tity of the controlled substance is not an element of an offense un- der section 841(a)(1) and is pertinent only for sentencing purposes
• explaining that an agreement between a drug supplier and purchaser to distribute a controlled substance can be inferred from the fact that the amount of drugs purchased was enough “to supply many others”
• involving a conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute tetrahydrofuran fentanyl, an analogue of fentanyl, a Schedule II controlled substance
• “If a reasonable jury could conclude that the evidence establishes guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, the verdict will be affirmed.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).