United States v. Jesus Cordova Barajas, AKA Jesus Magana Gudino

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trier of fact may “disbelieve [the defendant] and infer the opposite of his testimony”
• holding that “circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to demonstrate a defendant’s guilt”
• recognizing that “circumstantial evidence alone can be sufficient to demonstrate a defendant’s guilt”
• holding that a conviction for “cultivating” marijuana under 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 was supported by sufficient evidence where officers found defendant with a gar- den tool outside a structure “containing drying marijuana plants”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).