United States v. Jester

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[S]ince we have decided that the contract specifications were clear and unambiguous, and since trade practice cannot override unambiguous contract provisions (citation omitted
• “[S]ince we have decided that the contract specifications were clear and unambiguous, and since trade practice cannot override unambiguous contract provisions (citation omitted), we do not have to consider the question of what was required by trade practice in the industry.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).