United States v. Jessica A. Lemaire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that doctrine does not require reversal “unless the error was so patent as to have seriously jeopardized the rights of the appellant”
• “[Invited error] would remove the matter from being error requiring reversal, unless the error was so patent as to have seriously jeopardized the rights of the appellant.”
• “[Invited error] would remove the matter from being error requiring reversal, unless the error was so patent as to have seriously jeopardized the rights of the appellant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).