United States v. Jesse Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that fact of previous revocations was “something the judge was free, maybe required, to consider” in revocation proceedings
• reasoning that district court had not committed itself in advance to punishment announced by predecessor but instead had properly considered previous revocation in determining appropriate term of reimprisonment
• “The fact that the defendant’s supervised release had twice been revoked was something the judge was free, maybe required, to consider in deciding what sentence to impose for a third set of violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).