United States v. Jesse R. Hare

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that improper receipt of anything of value for performance of an official act was a continuing offense where the defendant received a loan that provided benefits over a prolonged period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Fred De La Mata
  Eleventh Circuit· 2001-09-27· cited 94×
• United States v. Bornman
  Third Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 46×
• United States v. Albert G. Bustamante
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 41×
• United States v. Bardon Blizzard, Jr., A/K/A Buzz Blizzard
  Fourth Circuit· 1994-06-20· cited 26×
• State v. Valdiviezo-Martinez
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2021-05-21· cited 13×
• United States v. Victor Tavarez-Levario
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-06-05· cited 9×
• United States v. Michael P. Knott
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-03-11· cited 2×
• United States v. Hipkins
  D. Maryland· 1991-02-12· cited 2×
• United States v. Aubrey
  E.D. Texas· 1999-05-18· cited 1×
• United States v. Harris
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-01-29· cited 1×
• United States v. Bustamante
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-02-10
• United States v. Victor Tavarez-Levario
  Fifth Circuit· 2015-06-12

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Toussie v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1970-03-02· cited 806×
• United States v. Harry F. Seuss
  First Circuit· 1973-06-04· cited 54×
• Howard P. Carroll and H. Carroll & Co. v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 1964-01-24· cited 37×
• United States v. Sloan
  S.D. New York· 1975-02-12· cited 13×
• United States v. Driggs
  U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York· 1903-09-28· cited 4×
• United States v. Garmatz
  D. Maryland· 1977-12-05· cited 3×