United States v. Jesse Campbell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a warrantless entry constitutional where officers reasonably believed a suspect would immediately destroy a package of methamphetamine upon opening it and discovering the police-planted transmitting device
• holding the defendant waived a third-party issue on appeal because he failed to object to that portion of the R&R regarding -6- No. 07-5519 United States v. Javaherpour the third-party issue
• “The law is well settled that a warrantless entry will be upheld when the circumstances then extant were such as to lead a person of reasonable caution to conclude that such evidence would probably be destroyed within the time necessary to obtain a search warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).