United States v. Jesse

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• summary of holdings at the end of a decision controlled and ambiguous statement in a footnote did not
• “Because the priority date of the [federal] reserved right relates back to the date of the reservation, reserved water rights threaten existing appropriators with divestment of their rights without compensation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).