United States v. Jerry Weissman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that credibility determinations are entitled to “great deference” (quoting Donato v. Plainview-Old Bethpage Cent. Sch. Dist., 96 F.3d 623, 634 (2d Cir. 1996))
• discussing Schwimmer and affirming district court’s finding that no implied joint defense agreement existed
• discussing Schwimmer and affirming district court’s finding that no implied joint defense agreement existed
• Senate subcommittee staff was required to spend significant additional time on the investigative hearings as a result of defendant’s obstructive conduct
• “Some form of joint strategy is necessary to establish a [joint defense agreement] rather than merely the impression of one side.”
• “The burden is on Weissman to demonstrate the existence of a JDA [joint defense agreement] that would have precluded admission in evidence of Weissman’s June 16th revelations of wrongdoing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).