United States v. Jerry Schneiderman, Jerry Ranallo, Larry Butler and Insertion Advertising Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the statute “provides sufficient guidance to prohibit its arbitrary or discriminatory application”
• explaining that administrative regulations and interpretations may provide sufficient clarification to save an otherwise vague statute
• explaining that administrative regulations and interpretations may provide sufficient clarification to save an otherwise vague statute
• Government must prove that defendant “knew there was a strong probability the items would be so used”
• Government must prove that defendant \knew there was a strong probability the items would be so used\
• “These guidelines tend to minimize the likelihood 22 of arbitrary enforcement by providing objective criteria against which to measure possible violations of the law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).