Eleventh Circuit· 9/21/1994

United States v. Jerry Ford

Citations

34 F.3d 992
1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26592
1994 WL 514580

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

defendant did not exhibit subjective expectation of privacy in the heat emitted from his home where defendant took no steps to conceal the heat and in fact took steps to expel the heat
\[t]he heat that Ford intentionally vented from his mobile home was a waste byproduct of his marijuana cultivation and is analogous to the inculpatory items that the respondents in Greenwood discarded in their trash....\
“[t]he heat that Ford intentionally vented from his mobile home was a waste byproduct of his marijuana cultivation and is analogous to the inculpatory items that the respondents in Greenwood, discarded in their trash. ...”
only owners, lessees, and occupants who can demonstrate significant and current interest in the searched premises have an expectation of privacy sufficient to confer standing to object to search, citing United States v. Garcia, 741 F.2d 363, 366 (11th Cir.1984)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kravitch, Birch, Hoeveler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.