United States v. Jerry Axselle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding single telephone call, combined with hearing voice in court, is sufficient for voice identification testimony to go to jury
• agent permitted to identify defendant’s voice in single phone call after hearing his voice in court on one occasion
• arguments that voice identification testimony was deficient because witness was not expert in voice identification, defendant’s voice had no peculiar characteristics, and witness had only heard defendant’s voice once outside of telephone conversation, go to weight of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).