United States v. Jerry Antonio Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that we are not bound to follow a prior circuit decision when it is “clearly undermined” by a subsequent decision by the Supreme Court
• rejecting Rashad as being “inconsistent with a wealth of Supreme Court authority” and overruling prior 4th Circuit authority upon which Rashad relied
• “To the extent that our prior decision . . . requires a different result, its holding is clearly undermined by the more recent Supreme Court decisions . . . . Accordingly, we are not bound to follow it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).