Skip to main content
· 10/17/1996

United States v. Jerome Williams, United States of America v. Zachary Marshall, United States of America v. Darryl Price

Citations

  • 95 F.3d 723

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • implying that nonstipulated polygraph evidence may be admissible under Daubert, but that District Court has discretion to exclude the evidence under rule 403
  • implying that polygraph evidence that has not been stipulated to may be admissible pursuant to Daubert if trial court finds that such evidence satisfies rule 403 of Federal Rules of Evidence
  • finding the district court acted within its discretion in granting defendant a two- week continuance after a Brady violation, rather than dismissing the case
  • finding the district court acted within its discretion in granting defendant a two-week continuance after a Brady violation, rather than dismissing the case
  • affirming denial of admission of polygraph into evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Gibson, Bowman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.