United States v. Jerome W. Bullis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the fact that the conspirators gener- ally changed the pricing levels each year of the con- spiracy did not make each year a separate conspiracy
• “[I]f there are distinct illegal ends and no overlapping interests between the alleged coconspira-tors, then there are separate conspiracies.” (quotation omitted)
• “[Tjurnover in the members of a conspiracy does not transform a single conspiracy into multiple conspiracies so long as there is a continuation of the original conspiracy’s purpose.”
• “A prosecution is vindictive and a violation of due process if undertaken to punish a person because he has done what the law plainly allowed him to do.”
• \A prosecution is vindictive and a violation of due process if undertaken to punish a person because he has done what the law plainly allowed him to do.\
• in pretrial situation, presumption of vindictiveness not applicable and defendant must come forward with objective evidence of actual vindictiveness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).