Skip to main content
· 4/1/1991

United States v. Jermal Daniels, A/K/A Tony

Citations

  • 929 F.2d 128
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5149
  • 1991 WL 42438

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under the Supremacy Clause, state law could not prevent consideration of juve- nile proceedings by a federal court in determining a sentence, when federal law provides otherwise
  • noting that under the Supremacy Clause, state law could not prevent consideration of juve- nile proceedings by a federal court in determining a sentence, when federal law provides otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eastern, Ervin, Merhige, Niemeyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.