· 4/1/1991
United States v. Jermal Daniels, A/K/A Tony
Citations
- 929 F.2d 128
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 5149
- 1991 WL 42438
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that under the Supremacy Clause, state law could not prevent consideration of juve- nile proceedings by a federal court in determining a sentence, when federal law provides otherwise
- noting that under the Supremacy Clause, state law could not prevent consideration of juve- nile proceedings by a federal court in determining a sentence, when federal law provides otherwise
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eastern, Ervin, Merhige, Niemeyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.