· 10/20/1995
United States v. Jermaine Boney
Citations
- 68 F.3d 497
- 314 U.S. App. D.C. 287
- 43 Fed. R. Serv. 55
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29683
- 1995 WL 612901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding district court abused its dis- cretion in failing to permit thorough examination of a juror to deter- mine actual bias
- holding district court abused its discretion in failing to permit thorough examination of a juror to determine actual bias
- holding, where jury foreman lied on jury questionnaire as to whether he had ever been convicted of a felony, Rule 606(b) did not prohibit district court from conducting evidentiary hearing and questioning foreman
- once dishonesty shown, need further inquiry to determine whether dishonesty motivated by bias
- once dishonesty shown, need further inquiry to determine whether dishonesty motivated by bias
- party with McDonough claim entitled to cross-examine juror; limited inquiry permitted by district court \virtually assured that the hearing would fail to discover any possible prejudice.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.