Skip to main content
· 10/20/1995

United States v. Jermaine Boney

Citations

  • 68 F.3d 497
  • 314 U.S. App. D.C. 287
  • 43 Fed. R. Serv. 55
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29683
  • 1995 WL 612901

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding district court abused its dis- cretion in failing to permit thorough examination of a juror to deter- mine actual bias
  • holding district court abused its discretion in failing to permit thorough examination of a juror to determine actual bias
  • holding, where jury foreman lied on jury questionnaire as to whether he had ever been convicted of a felony, Rule 606(b) did not prohibit district court from conducting evidentiary hearing and questioning foreman
  • once dishonesty shown, need further inquiry to determine whether dishonesty motivated by bias
  • once dishonesty shown, need further inquiry to determine whether dishonesty motivated by bias
  • party with McDonough claim entitled to cross-examine juror; limited inquiry permitted by district court \virtually assured that the hearing would fail to discover any possible prejudice.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edwards, Sentelle, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.