United States v. Jenny Nunez, United States of America v. Carlos Alberto Nunez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A]t a minimum,” defendants should “have had the ability to address [the newly admitted evidence] and argue its relevance and weight to the jury during summation”
• “Often, the single conspiracy is comprised of a loosely-knit association of members linked only by their mutual interest in sustaining the overall enterprise of catering to the ultimate demands of a particular drug consumption market.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).