United States v. Jeffrey Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “[c]riticizing the credibility of the movant’s affiants, alone, is not enough to avoid summary judgment”
• noting that “conduct unbecoming a member of the bar” includes “deliberately misleading the court or displaying egregious misjudgment”
• explaining the special need for sanctions when counsel’s unbecoming conduct affects other litigants or misleads the court
• affirming summary judgment where employee inspected area approximately five to ten minutes before the fall
• “Criticizing the credibility of the movant's affiants, alone, is not enough to avoid summary judgment.”
• court declined to draw an inference as to how long a hazard had existed when only supported by speculation or conjecture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).