United States v. Jeffrey Scott Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that categorical analysis of an almost identical statute \does not require an exploration of the underlying facts ... [but] study of the statutory definition of the particular offense....\
• holding that categorical -6- analysis of an almost identical statute \does not require an exploration of the underlying facts…[but] study of the statutory definition of the particular offense….\
• holding that categorical analysis of an almost identical statute “does not require an exploration of the underlying facts... [but] study of the statutory definition of the particular offense .... ”
• emphasizing reference to “by its nature” in § 924(c)(3)(B) and holding that “[t]o determine the nature of a crime requires an examination of the elements which compose it, . . . not . . . an exploration of the underlying facts”
• \[T]he `nature' of the offense of involuntary manslaughter is not subject to the varying facts of each case.\
• “[T]he ‘nature’ of the offense of involuntary manslaughter is not subject to the varying facts of each case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).