Skip to main content
· 2/9/2005

United States v. Jeffrey Schneider

Citations

  • 395 F.3d 78
  • 2005 WL 78513

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • hold- ing that an AUSA mistakenly reporting the holding of two cases was bad judgment, but not bad faith
  • “The case was not vexatious because the government had more than adequate evidence to establish each element of the crimes and the jury’s credibility determinations did not undermine the legal merit or factual foundation of the prosecution.”
  • \The case was not vexatious because the government had more than adequate evidence to establish each element of the crimes and the jury's credibility determinations did not undermine the legal merit or factual foundation of the prosecution.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leval, Katzmann

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.