United States v. Jeffrey S. Burd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the courts of appeals may instruct the district courts to conduct any further proceedings that may be appropriate under the circumstances
• reviewing de novo the district court’s application of Rule 36 to undisputed facts
• “[A] clerical error must not be one of judgment or even of misidentification, but merely of recitation, of the sort that a clerk or amanuensis might commit, mechanical in nature.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• correction required reconfiguration of the sentence to 14 make some terms consecutive to others, rather than having all terms concurrent, and 15 imposing prison terms on some counts that were shorter than originally intended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).