United States v. Jeffrey Paul Moser, A/K/A Harry N. Moser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a vague complaint about a “lot of facts” lacked specificity
• noting that, “unless a defendant objects to a specific factual allegation contained in the [report], the court may accept that fact as true for sentencing purposes”
• unless defendant objects to a specific factual allegation contained in the PSR, the sentencing court may accept that fact as true
• unless defendant objects to a specific factual allegation contained in the PSR, the sentencing court may accept that fact as true for sentencing purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).