United States v. Jeffrey Lynn Franklin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that combina- tion of charging documents and PSR did not establish that ele- ments of defendant’s prior convictions qualified as predicate offense under Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)
• noting that document charging that Franklin “did willfully and unlawfully enter ... with the intent to commit larceny” satisfied Taylor
• citing, inter alia, Taylor, 495 U.S. at 602, 110 S.Ct. 2143, and United States v. Bonat, 106 F.3d 1472, 1475-76 (9th Cir.1997)
• applying the modified categorical approach prior to Navarro-Lopez to California Penal Code § 459, even though § 459 does not require proof of unlawful entry
• listing documents which, for modified categorical analysis, can and cannot “clearly establish” defendant’s con- duct
• explaining 5 Count three in the November 21, 2000, Information states: On or about October 18, 2000, in the County of Los Angeles, the crime of EVADING AN OFFICER, WILLFUL DISRE- GARD, in violation of VEHICLE CODE SECTION 2800.2(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).