United States v. Jeffrey L. Foster and Karla Foster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “there is no Doyle violation if the district court promptly sustains a timely objection to a question concerning post-arrest silence, and gives a curative jury instruction”
• finding a Doyle error where the court “overruled a timely objection, advised the defendant to answer the question and admitted . . . testimony acknowledging [the defendant’s] post-arrest silence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).