Skip to main content
· 10/14/1986

United States v. Jeffrey K. Rafsky

Citations

  • 803 F.2d 105
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 32222

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that mail fraud statute's stringent intent requirements clarify nature of proscribed conduct and safeguard against arbitrary enforcement
  • scheme to defraud based on numerous insufficient funds checks held violative of § 1344

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Stapleton, Garth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.