United States v. Jeffrey Jordan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that statements identifying a coconspirator’s source for drugs have been held to be in furtherance of the conspiracy
• “A statement informing a coconspirator of the methods of obtaining [drugs] is admissible because it is designed to help ensure continued involvement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).