Skip to main content
· 8/5/1999

United States v. Jeffrey J. Decoteau

Citations

  • 186 F.3d 1008
  • 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 18276
  • 1999 WL 570956

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing the district court's order striking the government's witnesses for a discovery deadline violation and noting that the defendant's failure to request a continuance supported a finding that the defendant was not prejudiced
  • government disclosed witnesses 2 days late but 12 days prior to trial and listing similar cases
  • government disclosed witnesses 2 days late but 12 days prior to trial and listing similar cases
  • “[T]he court also failed to engage in any analysis concerning whether a less severe sanction would have been sufficient to remedy any prejudice DeCo-teau may have suffered.”
  • “[A] district court in this circuit may exercise its discretion to require such disclosure in a proper case.”
  • government disclosed witnesses 2 days late but 12 days prior to trial and listing similar cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hansen, Magill, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.