United States v. Jeffrey Allen Stoltz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that officers’ search of the defendant’s wallet pursuant to search warrant authorizing search for “receipts” was appropriate because “receipts may be found in a wallet”
• rejecting the argument that the ten-year period in Federal Rule of Evidence 609(b) commenced upon discharge from probation, noting that the phrase “release from confinement” means release from physical confinement
• “As our sister cir- cuits have held, confinement for purposes of the ten-year time limit in Rule 609(b) does not include periods of probation. Rather, Rule 609(b
• counting the ten-year period from the date of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).