United States v. Jeffrey Allen Devono

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant admitted to the challenged aggravator when defense counsel stated at sentencing, “We didn’t object to the factual basis in the Presentence Report because frankly we believed that the facts are true that are set forth in there.”
• holding that defendant admitted to the challenged aggravator when defense counsel stated at sentencing, \We didn't object to the factual basis in the Presentence Report because frankly we believed that the facts are true that are set forth in there.\
• defendant admitted facts where, inter alia, defense counsel stated “ ‘we believe[ ] that the facts [in the PSR] are true’ ”
• defendant admitted facts where, inter alia, defense counsel stated \`we believe[ ] that the facts [in the PSR] are true'\
• defendant admitted facts where, inter alia, defense counsel stated \`we believe[] that the facts [in the PSR] are true'\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).