United States v. Jeffery Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that one purpose of permissive joinder is to promote judicial efficiency
• “Because the [indictment] charged the defendants with using the specific Ruger pistol . . . , the jury [must] conclude that the defendants used the Ruger pistol (and not just any firearm) . . . .”
• “[I]t is well established that ‘the state of mind re- quired for conviction as an aider and abettor is the same state of mind required for the principal offense.’” (quoting United States v. Reiswitz, 941 F.2d 488, 494 (7th Cir. 1991))
• “[I]t is well established that ‘the state of mind re- quired for conviction as an aider and abettor is the same state of mind required for the principal offense.’” (quoting United States v. Reiswitz, 941 F.2d 488, 494 (7th Cir. 1991))
• “[I]t is well established that ‘the state of mind re- quired for conviction as an aider and abettor is the same state of mind required for the principal offense.’” (quoting United States v. Reiswitz, 941 F.2d 488, 494 (7th Cir. 1991))
• “[I]t is well established that ‘the state of mind re- quired for conviction as an aider and abettor is the same state of mind required for the principal offense.’” (quoting United States v. Reiswitz, 941 F.2d 488, 494 (7th Cir. 1991))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).