United States v. Jeff Pawlinski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that federal courts do not have discretion to redirect restitution in a manner that ignores the statutory limits Congress placed on restitution orders
• emphasizing that federal courts do not have discretion to redirect restitution in a manner that ignores the statutory limits Congress placed on restitution orders
• stating the time limits in § 3664(d)(5) \can some- times be bent\
• “[T]he entry of an illegal sentence is No. 03-2875 15 a serious error routinely corrected on plain-error review.”
• “[t]he entry of an illegal sentence is a serious error routinely corrected on plain-error review”
• “[T]he entry of an illegal sentence is a serious error routinely corrected on plain error review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).