United States v. Jeff Levenderis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In its Bond decision, the Supreme Court avoided addressing the constitutional issue, holding instead that, as a matter of statutory interpretation, § 229(a) did not cover the defendant’s unremarkable local offense.”
• “Defendant stresses the fact that the room was small and the agents sat closely around his bed while they questioned him. However, there is also no evidence agents prevented him from getting up from his bed.”
• suspect not in custody during 30-minute interview and second, shorter interview
• affirming § 175(a) conviction for possession of ricin
• characterizing a thirty-minute interview as “relatively brief”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).