Skip to main content
· 3/8/2006

United States v. Jean-Marie Rosemond Dulcio

Citations

  • 441 F.3d 1269
  • 2006 WL 551557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that because agents testified as lay witnesses, their testimony did not invoke Rule 704 (b) because it only applies to expert testimony, and “Rule 704 (a) expressly allows opinion testimony by non-expert witnesses”
  • Federal Rule 704 (b)’s bar on ultimate issue applies only to expert witness testimony and not opinion testimony by lay witnesses
  • “We agree that it is error to admit opin- ion testimony of lay witnesses based upon specialized knowledge, such as [testimony by an agent on the modus operandi of people involved in the drug business].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Barkett, Hunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.