United States v. J.B. Brown

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that since a potential juror’s an- swer was “clear enough on its face,” it was “unlikely that fur- ther questions would have changed the government’s impres- sion”
• concluding that since a potential juror’s an- swer was “clear enough on its face,” it was “unlikely that fur- ther questions would have changed the government’s impres- sion”
• concluding that since a potential juror’s an- swer was “clear enough on its face,” it was “unlikely that fur- ther questions would have changed the government’s impres- sion”
• “It is the defendant’s burden to raise specific arguments that the government’s justification was pretextual so that the court can properly address them.”
• “It is the defendant’s burden to raise specific arguments that the government’s justification was pretextual so that the court can properly address them.”
• prospective juror's belief that he had been wrongfully arrested was race-neutral reason for peremptory strike

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).