United States v. Jay W. Wilson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting we “afford the district court great deference because of its unique position to evaluate a defendant’s acceptance of responsibility”
• denying a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility where the defendant disputed his involvement in a drug conspiracy and “maintained his factual innocence during and after trial”
• denying a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility where the defendant disputed his involvement in a drug conspiracy and “maintained his factual innocence during and after trial”
• denying a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility where the defendant disputed his involvement in a drug conspiracy and “maintained his factual innocence during and after trial”
• con- tract principles apply to claimed immunity agreements, including requirement that prosecution objectively offered or promised immunity in exchange for some consideration
• contract principles apply to claimed immunity agreements, including requirement that prosecution objectively offered or promised immunity in exchange for some consideration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).