United States v. Jay Teitler and Marc G. Schultz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• jury could “reasonably infer” defendant’s agreement to participate in RICO conspiracy from, among other things, his “status as a partner in the Teitler firm” and “testimony concerning [his] role in the firm”
• “sporadic activity” is not a pattern

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).