United States v. Javier Aparco-Centeno

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defense counsel’s agreement with the judge’s proposed course of conduct “waived his claim on this issue”
• holding that the defendant waived the claim where he agreed to the underlying facts in a memorandum and motion
• explaining that a party waives appellate review when they agree in open court with the district court’s conclusion
• “An attorney cannot agree in open court with a judge’s proposed course of conduct and then charge the court with error in following that course.” (quoting United States v. Sloman, 909 F.2d 176, 182 (6th Cir. 1990)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).