United States v. Jared S. Fogle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the sentencing court’s “explanation need not be exhaus- tive” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• explaining that the sentencing court’s “explanation need not be exhaus- tive” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted)
• district court’s sentencing explanation need not be exhaustive but must be adequate to allow for meaningful appellate review and promote perception of fair sentencing
• district court’s sentencing explanation need not be exhaustive but must be adequate to allow for meaningful appellate review and promote perception of fair sentencing
• district court’s sentencing explanation need not be exhaustive but must be adequate to allow for meaningful appellate review and promote perception of fair sentencing
• district court’s sentencing explanation need not be exhaustive but must be adequate to allow for meaningful appellate review and promote perception of fair sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).