United States v. Jardee Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• overwhelming evidence found when package contained drugs, defendant’s name, and defendant was seen picking up package and throwing it out of car
• describing the “investigative tools” of the Postal Service’s “Narcotic Mail Profile Program” as impermissible drug courier profile evidence
• “Drug courier profiles are investigative tools, not evidence of guilt. . . . [They] are not to be admitted as substantive evidence of guilt.”
• “Drug courier profiles are investigative tools, not evidence of guilt.... [They] are not to be admitted as substantive evidence of guilt.”
• “The admission of a profile into evidence is inherently prejudicial and can easily influence a jury into thinking that the defendant is guilty.”
• “Drug courier profiles are investigative tools, not evidence of guilt. . . . [They] are not to be admitted as substantive evidence of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).