United States v. Janze

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no \joint defense doctrine\ protection where attorneys did not communicate about joint effort to defend case
• no “joint defense doctrine” protection where attorneys did not communicate about joint effort to defend case
• \[T]he general rule is that litigation need not necessarily be imminent as long as the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\
• \[T]he general rule is that litigation need not necessarily be imminent as long as the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\
• \[T]he general rule is that litigation need not necessarily be imminent as long as the primary motivating purpose behind the creation of the document was to aid in possible future litigation.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).